Research and public sociology
Study Replication for SCORE Project (Center for Open Science)
We test the claim from O’Brien & Noy (2015) that although the post-secular perspective entails high levels of science knowledge as well as favorable views of science and religion, when scientific and religious perspectives conflict (e.g. evolution), the post-secular latent class almost unanimously aligned their views with particular religious accounts. This reflects the following statement from the paper’s abstract: “Overall, most individuals favor either scientific or religious ways of understanding, but many scientifically inclined individuals prefer certain religious accounts.” Participants’ responses to the General Social Survey (GSS) weresubmitted to a latent class analysis that resulted in a three-class solution characterized as representing traditional, modern, and post-secular perspectives on science and religion. Following this assignment, two-tailed t-tests were used to compare responses between the three groups; for the purposes of the SCORE project, the focal test is the comparison between the Traditional and Post-Secular groups on the question concerning evolution (‘Human beings developed from earlier species of animals’, yes or no). Members of the post-secular category were significantly less likely than members of the traditional group to respond that humans evolved from other animals (3 percent, significant at p < 0.05 on a two-tailed test, see Table 2, rightmost column).We replicate this study using the GSS years not included in the original survey. All variables remain the same.